Search for: "Baylor v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 61
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2011, 6:59 am
Here is the abstract: A non-citizen convicted of violating a Texas state criminal statute is subject to a variety of harsh immigration penalties including deportation from the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
Addressing the e-waste crisis: the need for comprehensive federal e-waste regulation within the United States. 14 Chapman L. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 7:51 am
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:38 pm
" The organization of this article is as follows: Part I provides a brief history of pleading theory within the United States and a reexamination of the Conley v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 11:39 am
constitutional cases, such as Brown v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:23 am
She appealed on the grounds that the offense was an unconstitutional appropriation of powers reserved to the states, but the 3rd Circuit rejected that, finding that the statute was enacted to implement the treaty obligations of the United States under the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention, and therefore fell under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Congress’ powers under the Constitution. [read post]
16 May 2010, 10:24 pm
In Cross v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:46 pm
AND BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:37 am
Interlocutory appeal for medical residents at state hospitals (two cases) Geoffrey Klein, M.D. and Baylor College of Medicine v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:06 pm
Baylor Publ’g. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 2:30 am
Arlen Beam of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:17 pm
Commonwealth Human Relations Comm'n v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:05 pm
"The United States is one of the few countries that hand out JLWOP sentences. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Kitson v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 9:46 am
(Justice Willett not sitting)State of Texas v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 1:00 am
Although self-described as an alternative assessment of the impact of recent Supreme Court punitive damage decisions, the article ultimately echoes the refrain advanced by, among others, members of the defense bar immediately following the United States Supreme Court's decision in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
3 May 2008, 6:37 pm
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981). [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:31 pm
The bill would also "correct" the decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Baylor, No. 07-3002 Defendant's convictions for interfering with commerce by robbery, in violation of the Hobbs Act, and using a firearm in relation to a crime of violence are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the requirement of a de minimis effect on interstate commerce under the Hobbs Act is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court's decision in US v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:20 pm
In this schema, lawyers report directly to nonlawyers, and in cases where the client is someone other than the employer, the attorney owes a duty of loyalty to them both. [31] Many observers state pragmatically that for all intents and purposes, the MDP revolution has already arrived in relation to corporate practice. [32] Indeed, by the numbers, Arthur Andersen was the biggest employer of lawyers in the United States in 2000. [33] … [read post]
