Search for: "Bear Stops v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 1,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm by Josh Blackman
Rather, the only parties that could bring the claim are the alien’s associates (relative or organization) within the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 3:51 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Let’s assume that driverless cars are remarkably safe: Instead of the 30,000+ people who now die annually in car accidents in the United States, suppose driverless cars result in a mere 10,000 deaths every year. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 7:32 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
United States, 260 U.S. 178, 190 (1922) (finding that Japanese immigrant was not eligible for naturalization); United States v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am by Josh Blackman
These statements bear on the order only indirectly, and the panel did not seem particularly interested here either. [read post]