Search for: "Becker v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2012, 2:07 pm
In a decision issued a few minutes ago, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia struck down the NLRB’s new election rules because the Board lacked a quorum when it attempted to adopt the final rule. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:31 am
The NLRB has filed a motion asking District of Columbia District Court Judge James Boasberg to amend his ruling that struck down the Board’s election reform rules because the Board did not have a quorum of three members when it passed the new rules. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently provided some much-needed clarification to the meaning of “Willful” with respect to violations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, in the case of Dayton Tire v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:55 am
Ten days after Outland was decided, the United States District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit determined that the President Obama’s recess appointments in January 2012 were illegal and therefore NLRB has not had a working quorum since the end of Member Becker’s term at the end of December, 2011. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
The District Court in Owen v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 7:30 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 2:09 pm
Becker, Human Capital (1st ed. 1964); Gary S. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:16 am
The National Labor Relations Board filed a Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment yesterday in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v NLRB, Civil Action No. 11-2262, where District of Columbia District Court Judge James Boasberg struck down the NLRB's "quickie election" rules because the NLRB lacked a quorum when it passed the new rules. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:20 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:41 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:11 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia (per Ginsburg, C.J.) determined that, as a matter of Constitutional law, "compensation for a non-physical personal injury is not income under the Sixteenth Amendment if . . . [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 11:27 am
Just three weeks ago, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals in Canning v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:29 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia challenging the NLRB’s highly controversial “Notice Posting Rule” that would require businesses to post notices and inform employees right to bargain collectively, distribute union literature, and engage in other union activities without reprisal under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), which is set become effective April 30, 2012. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 6:39 pm
When the rule was promulgated (over a din of complaints), it was immediately challenged in South Carolina and in the District of Columbia. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:43 am
Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia recently cast into doubt the validity of all National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) decisions in the year 2012 by holding that three of the current Board members were invalidly appointed. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Does 1-19 (District of Columbia)Arista v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
Applying Jackson, a federal district court concluded that “Arkansas has not adopted alternative or market share liability,” in Fields v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Epstein Becker Green’s blog also notes that: New Mexico and Ok [read post]
