Search for: "Beecham v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Supreme Court: Pharmaceutical Companies Are Not Required To Pay Sales Reps Overtime
29 Jun 2012, 9:01 am by James Ramey
In Christopher v. [read post]
Knudsen Law Firm Blog - http://www.knudsenlaw.com/our-blog/
Supreme Court Rules That Pharmaceutical Sales Reps are Exempt Outside Salespersons
18 Jun 2012, 10:37 am by rlargent@cdflaborlaw.com
Largent Today the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Christopher v. [read post]
California Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.callaborlaw.com/
9th Cir.: Notwithstanding DOL’s Position Otherwise, Pharmaceutical Reps (PSRs) Are “Outside Sales” Exempt
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am by Andrew Frisch
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
Overtime Law Blog | FLSA Decisions - http://overtimelaw.wordpress.com
Another Front in the Same-Sex Equality Campaign: Jury Service, Peremptory Challenges, and the Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Abbott Laboratories Case Pending in the Ninth Circuit
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  One such setting is raised by an interesting and important case, Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Nevada Tells 9th Circuit It Will No Longer Defend Its Same-Sex Marriage Ban
11 Feb 2014, 8:01 am by Howard Friedman
The attorney general told the court:After thoughtful review and analysis, the state has determined that its arguments grounded upon equal protection and due process are no longer sustainable.Nevada's Governor Brian Sandoval agrees with the attorney general.As described by SCOTUSblog, the state changed its position after considering the 9th Circuit's decision last month in SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
Religion Clause - http://religionclause.blogspot.com/
Supreme Court finds pharmaceutical sales reps exempt under the outside sales exemption
20 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm by Leigh Anne Benedic
Smith Kline Beecham Corp. [read post]
Employer Law Report - http://www.employerlawreport.com/
To Stay Or Not To Stay?
18 Sep 2008, 10:13 am
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 2008 WL 2337283 (E.D.Wis., 2008)(denying plaintiff's opposed motion for stay); Horne v. [read post]
Mass Tort Defense - http://www.masstortdefense.com/
Preemption In Philadelphia
20 Mar 2008, 10:29 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., ___ F. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
N.D.Ohio: Where Defendant Retains Right to Reject Contracts Obtained by Door-to-Door Solicitors, Otherwise Allowed by Law to Enter Into Contracts, Outside Sales Exemption Inapplicable
6 Jan 2014, 7:02 am by Andrew Frisch
Following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Christopher v. [read post]
Overtime Law Blog - http://flsaovertimelaw.com/
One Small Step For Employers, One Giant Leap For The Pharmaceutical Industry
21 Jun 2012, 8:43 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
Hunton Employment & Labor Law Perspectives - http://www.huntonlaborblog.com/
Mason Jarring, But Very Little There There
3 Mar 2010, 12:12 pm by Beck, et al.
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 2010 WL 605922, slip op. (7th Cir. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Fifth Circuit Affirms Exclusion of Plaintiff's Causation Experts
5 Apr 2010, 4:45 am by Sean Wajert
  Wells v. [read post]
Mass Tort Defense - http://www.masstortdefense.com/
Can You Strike Potential Jurors Because of Their Sexual Orientation?
16 Aug 2013, 6:25 am by John Day
  Here is link to all of the briefs in the Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
Day on Torts - http://www.dayontorts.com/
Pro se appellant Agarwal loses at CAFC: arguments that are not appropriately developed are waived
10 Jun 2022, 10:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” United States v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Tuckered Out
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 2007 WL 2726259 (S.D. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Ninth Circuit Solidifies Split of Authority on Drug Sales Representative Overtime Exemption
25 Feb 2011, 8:00 am by M. Scott McIntyre
SmithKline Beecham Corp.pdf, __F.3d___, 2011 WL 489708 (9thCir. [read post]
Employment Class Action Blog - http://www.employmentclassactionreport.com/
2012 Employment Law Predictions
4 Jan 2012, 6:49 am
 He is keeping his eye on:   Christopher v. [read post]
Texas Employment Law Blog - http://www.texasemploymentlawblog.com/
GlaxoSmithKline Buried Paxil Birth Defect Reports, Jury told
18 Oct 2009, 2:43 am
(Kilker v. [read post]
Dallas Fort Worth Injury Lawyer Blog - http://www.dallasfortworthinjurylawyer.com/
Third Circuit: Allegation of "significantly younger" comparator is good enough to state an age discrimination claim under the ADEA
1 Mar 2021, 6:18 am
SmithKline Beecham Clinical Lab., 950 F. [read post]
Lawffice Space - http://www.lawfficespace.com/
The Spirit of the FLSA Haunts a Highly Paid Employee
20 Jun 2016, 3:50 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Jeff Glaser As we’ve discussed on this blog before, the Supreme Court’s decision in Christopher v SmithKline Beecham Corp. had many layers. [read post]
The Wage and Hour Litigation Blog - http://www.wagehourlitigation.com