Search for: "Been v. Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,792
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2024, 7:00 pm
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Following its creation, defendant elected to proceed on the charges against plaintiff that had previously been brought by JCOPE.Prior to any hearings related to the charges against him, plaintiff commenced the instant action for declaratory judgment seeking to find Executive Law § 94 unconstitutional and moved to enjoin defendant from any further action on the pending charges against him. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Following its creation, defendant elected to proceed on the charges against plaintiff that had previously been brought by JCOPE.Prior to any hearings related to the charges against him, plaintiff commenced the instant action for declaratory judgment seeking to find Executive Law § 94 unconstitutional and moved to enjoin defendant from any further action on the pending charges against him. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The biggest—though not the only—divergence has been the designation of individual Russian oligarchs and, to a lesser extent, financial institutions. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:44 pm
Ariz. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am
Bruce Lehrmann has been granted an extension of time to consider appeal after the judge described Network Ten’s statements outside court after judgment as “discourteous” and “misleading”. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:20 pm
Davis, 10 Ill. 2d 566, 573–74 (1957)). [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Lately that noise has been almost continuous during the day and into the evening . . . [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm
The trial court below told the jury, consistent with what the prosecutor told them in their closing argument, that the standard is not that you didn't care whether the person was killed, but rather "the standard for this charge is[,] I don’t care if someone is hurt or killed, arguing that the defendant was guilty because he "didn't care that Anthony Davis [the victim] was hurt. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In 1969, in Tinker v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
App’x 364, 366–67 (9th Cir. 2018) (considering personal contacts between the appellant and state of Washington to find personal jurisdiction to enforce a foreign arbitral award); S & Davis Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
Davis, involving a confession erroneously admitted at a murder trial (over Jackson’s dissent). [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:45 am
In this post, Sarah Coates-Madden, Senior Associate at CMS, and Fiona Dalling, Associate at CMS, preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Davies v Bridgend County Borough Council. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
” Raskin is a former law professor (and one of the most astute legal minds in Congress) who has been very active in, among other things, the congressional investigation into events of Donald Trump and others on January 6, 2021.Just a few minutes into his prepared remarks, Raskin interrupted by seemingly pro-Palestinian protesters who shouted that Raskin is “complicit in genocide. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account approval process, which… [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
At the time of writing, judgment has not been handed down. [read post]
