Search for: "Belknap v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2021, 9:17 am
As I observed in the earlier posts, the traditional understanding of the impeachment power in the United States up until the early twentieth century was that the "impeachment" occurs when an authorized member of the lower chamber appears on the floor of the upper chamber and "impeaches" an officer by formally leveling an accusation and demanding a trial. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
In his 1819 opinion in McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 6:37 pm
Mineta, the former Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation,1 who oversees operations of the Federal Aviation Administration("FAA" or "Agency"), alleging that the FAA failed to rehire him due to his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
And Chief Justice Warren Burger once said of him that he could not identify “any judicial colleague more highly qualified to have come to the Supreme Court of the United States than Henry Friendly. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:03 am
Tompkins and Miranda v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 11:11 am
Sarah Barringer-Gordon, The Spirit of the Law: Religious Voices and the Constitution in Modern America (Belknap/Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 2010) pp. 316 Christopher Eisgruber & Lawrence Sager, Religious Freedom and the Constitution (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 2010, Paperback) pp. 352 Everson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
R. 501.5 See United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
R. 501.5 See United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Harris’ tie-breaking vote) could decide this question for itself, and rely on the Nixon v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
Make WTO Case
The National Law Journal
As the United States begins high-stakes World Trade Organization talks with China about intellectual property and trade barrier disputes, private attorneys representing an alliance of hundreds of companies have logged nearly two years helping the government build its case. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:12 am
. : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2011 xi, 506 p. ; 24 cm. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Magliocca makes a good case for why such appeals to fixity were likely unavoidable in the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:08 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
[i] Elizabeth Borgwardt, A New Deal for the World: America’s Vision for Human Rights (Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard, 2005). [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Eaton (Oklahoma State University), and Bradley S. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
This provision applies to those who hold "office . . . under" the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 9:00 pm
They were on their own.Ants v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]
