Search for: "Berry v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2010, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
Hammond, “The Occurrence of Asbestosis among Insulation Workers in the United States,” 132 Annals N.Y. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to… [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/10/19/08-99005.pdf United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 5:34 am by INFORRM
FOI vs DP: the battle continues, Alison White Privacy Laws & Business United Kingdom Newsletter P.L. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:25 am
Yogubliz filed the action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California seeking a declaratory judgment that its BLIZZBERRY and BLIZZ FROZEN YOGURT marks did not infringe DQ’s BLIZZARD marks. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:49 pm
Surveillance for Acute Viral Hepatitis—- United States, 2007. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
., at or in the direction of another, whether or not the actor believes it to be loaded; or (5) Commits a simple assault as defined in subsection a. (1), (2) or (3) of this section upon: (a) Any law enforcement officer acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or exhibiting evidence of his authority or because of his status as a law enforcement officer; or (b) Any paid or volunteer fireman acting in the performance of his duties while in uniform or otherwise clearly identifiable as… [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm by Simon Fodden
District Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:03 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Military Rule of Evidence 612 permits an attorney to refresh a witness' recollection with a "writing," with courts liberally construing the word "writing" to include basically anything (e.g., a photograph, food, or a piece of music).... [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 12:31 am
This approach was on display during the dense and complex arguments in Samantar v. [read post]