Search for: "Bett v City of Lackawanna"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
The firefighter sued and the court found that he was entitled to continue receiving his salary because Lackawanna had never made a determination pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-a (3) that he was medically able to perform light duties [see Bett v City of Lackawanna, 132 Misc 2d 630, affirmed 132 AD2d 951, 76 NY2d 900). [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
See, for example, Cook v City of Utica, 88 NY2d 833 and Bett v City of Lackawanna et al.,76 NY2d 900.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_00782.htm _________________ The Disability Benefits E-book: - This 810 page e-book focuses on disability leaves and benefits available to officers and employees in public service pursuant to Civil Service Law §§71, 72 and 73, General… [read post]
