Search for: "Betts v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2018, 3:45 pm
United States and Hirabayashi v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 2:41 pm
The Court similarly rejected Betts's claim that his offense did not warrant the four years and that the District Court had wrongly rejected his mitigation evidence.The Court found that the requirement that the zero tolerance for the use of any drugs was permissible, noting that it did not apply to any prescription drugs.The Court did find that the ban on alcohol was not not reasonably reasonably related to any of the factors outlined in Section 5D1.3(b) of the Guidelines… [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 8:24 am
In Midler v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:58 am
In Midler v Ford Motor Co., the singer and voice-actor Bette Midler asserted her rights in her voice, which was imitated in an advert by Ford. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:13 am
., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm
United States U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am
The court in Sacklow v Betts very recently encountered the issue of a legal name change in NJ for a transgender child. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am
The court in Sacklow v Betts very recently encountered the issue of a legal name change in NJ for a transgender child. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 6:02 am
The appellant Navico lost:Navico Inc. and Navico Holding AS appeal from a FinalDetermination of the United States InternationalTrade Commission that resulted in an exclusionary orderprohibiting importation of certain sonar imaging devices.The Final Determination includes a finding of infringementof U.S. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:15 am
Years later, that Supreme Court decision, Korematsu v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 10:57 am
The parties are the major suppliers of PVC-coated electrical conduit in the United States; T&B’s conduit is known as “Ocal. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:02 am
849 F.2d 460 (9th Cir. 1989) (misappropriation of Bette Midler’s voice) and Waits v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 7:40 am
The plaintiffs filed their lawsuit, Betts v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
Can Member States do so, or is it exclusively an EU prerogative? [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
A: The inventor, Bette Nesmith Graham, is the mother of band member Michael Nesmith. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:20 am
” Cobb v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
The user can do so by virtue of an implied licence (Betts v Willmot (1871)) or, in European patent systems, by the principle of exhaustion of rights after the first sale of the product. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
Betts v. [read post]
