Search for: "Bibby v. Philadelphia Coca Cola Bottling Co."
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
Philadelphia Coca Cola Bottling Co. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 7:43 am
Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 260 F.3d 257 (3d Cir. 2001)("It is clear, however, that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
Philadelphia Coca Cola Bottling Co. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:57 am
Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co., which held that Title VII protections could not be extended to claims of discrimination based on sexual orientation. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:30 am
Philadelphia Coca Cola Bottling Co.), which held that “Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 2:31 pm
Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 260 F.3d 257 (3rd Cir. 2001), which had very similar facts to those alleged by Prowel. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:12 pm
The appeals court immediately focused on a similar case that it decided in 2001, the often-cited decision in Bibby v Philadelphia Coca Cola Bottling Co., 260 F.3d 257 (3d Cir. 2001). [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 8:36 pm
Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 260 F.3d 257 (3rd Cir. 2001). [read post]
