Search for: "Birmingham v. Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 83
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2014, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 9:33 am
Supreme Court Tomlinson & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2010] UKSC 8 (17 February 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Harley & Ors v Smith & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 78 (17 February 2010) Actavis UK Ltd v Novartis AG [2010] EWCA Civ 82 (17 February 2010) Davies & Anor, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue & Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 83 (16 February 2010) Virdi v The Law Society of England and Wales & Anor [2010]… [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:37 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 2:51 pm
This is the same protocol that was at issue in Glossip v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the application… [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
See further, Harrow London Borough Council v Qazi [2003] UKHL 43; [2004] 1 A.C. 983; [2003] 3 W.L.R. 792; [2003] H.L.R. 75, per Lord Bingham [22] and Birmingham CC v Doherty [2008] UKHL 57, [2009] 1 A.C. 367, [2008] H.L.R. 45, in the written submissions for Birmingham (noted at 391F-G, 392E-F and per Lord Hope at 401E. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
See further, Harrow London Borough Council v Qazi [2003] UKHL 43; [2004] 1 A.C. 983; [2003] 3 W.L.R. 792; [2003] H.L.R. 75, per Lord Bingham [22] and Birmingham CC v Doherty [2008] UKHL 57, [2009] 1 A.C. 367, [2008] H.L.R. 45, in the written submissions for Birmingham (noted at 391F-G, 392E-F and per Lord Hope at 401E. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Makisi & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 355 Does the right to make oral submissions to a review officer on a s.202 Housing Act 1996 review, following a 'minded to' letter, mean that the applicant has the right to insist on a meeting? [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Makisi & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 355 Does the right to make oral submissions to a review officer on a s.202 Housing Act 1996 review, following a 'minded to' letter, mean that the applicant has the right to insist on a meeting? [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
What Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57 actually means for a public law defence to possession claims, particularly summary possession, was the subject of London Borough of Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin). [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:30 am
Supreme Court Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd [2012] UKSC 17 (2 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) OB v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2012] EWCA Civ 501 (02 May 2012) ConvaTec Ltd & Ors v Smith & Nephew Healthcare Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 520 (02 May 2012) Kizhakudan v Secretary of State for Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 566 (02 May 2012) Birmingham City Council v Akhtar & Ors [2012]… [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 9:33 am
Mirza v Mirza is a further example of this truism and I can only marvel at the way Stephen Smith QC, sitting as a Deputy Chancery Judge, dealt with the case. [read post]
19 May 2012, 1:36 pm
Birmingham City Council, Trengrove v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:40 pm
Yesterday David Smith reported on Landlord Law Blog on the recent case of R (Gaskin) v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Justice Blake considered the relevant principles to be applied in relation to the PSEDs, as summarised in R(Boyejo & Ors) v Barnett LBC and Smith v Portsmouth CC [2009] EWHC (Admin) 755. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 12:03 pm
Smith v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
” Briefly: Campbell Robertson and Adam Liptak of the New York Times preview next Tuesday’s argument in Smith v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 1:14 pm
In McTear v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
On the same day Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the case of Kirkegaard v Smith. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:41 pm
The opinion in Maples v. [read post]
