Search for: "Black v. General Electric Co." Results 1 - 20 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2020, 11:22 pm by Neil Wilkof
The Intellectual Property Office of Singapore ("IPOS") deliberated this issue in Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd v Digi International Inc. [2020] SGIPOS 1.The Parties Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd (the "Opponent") is a Japanese company dealing inter alia, in electronic price-computing scales named 'DIGI'. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 10:07 am by Nassiri Law
A black, transgender man is accusing GE (General Electric) of discrimination, sexual harassment and retaliation after he was reportedly fired from his job of two years. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 10:07 am by Nassiri Law
A black, transgender man is accusing GE (General Electric) of discrimination, sexual harassment and retaliation after he was reportedly fired from his job of two years. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:00 am
The Board's recognition of a "family of marks" is about as rare as a fish in a tree, but in Black & Decker Corp. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:30 am by Patricia McConnico
Pavement Salvage Co., 396 U.S. 57 (1969); Sakraids v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:09 am by Lyle Denniston
  Justice Sonia Sotomayor is recused from the case of American Electric Power Co., et al., v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
However, he found that the pursuer’s claim fell within one of the recognised exceptions to that general rule: where the obligation imposed by the statute was imposed for the benefit of a particular class of individuals, then the statute may be taken to have created “a correlative right in those persons who may be injured by its contravention” (per Lord Kinnear, Black v Fife Coal Co. [read post]
18 May 2022, 10:13 am by Jennifer M. Herrmann
General Electric Co., a First Circuit ADEA retaliation case in which the employer terminated an employee in part for his “confrontational attitude” and other interpersonal issues with coworkers and managers against whom he alleged age discrimination. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm by Schachtman
Lincoln Electric Co., 620 F.3d 665 (6th Cir. 2010). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm by war
It is correct to say that deceptive similarity is a question for the tribunal of fact and is not a matter for any witness to decide but, as the passage cited by Gummow J from Lord Diplock’s judgment in General Electric Co (USA) v General Electric Co Ltd [1972] 1 WLR 729 at 738 makes plain, to say that a question is for the tribunal of fact or to describe it as a “jury question” does not mean that evidence going to that… [read post]