Search for: "Blake v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 460
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Blake (1820), concluding: "[The United States] is the name given to our great republic, which is composed of States and territories. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
United Kingdom and previously held to be correct as a matter of international law by a number of American and English judges (Siderman de Blake v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
United States, continued to keep Court watchers and commentators busy yesterday. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:27 pm
§ 2255 asserting that a federal sentence must be corrected due to error under United States v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 2:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:33 pm
But a new Seventh Circuit decision from just last week, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Exhausting administrative remediesRoss v Blake, USSC, Docket No. 15-339This decision by the United States Supreme Court considered an appeal involving the federal Prison Litigation Reform Act [PLRA], 42 USC 1997e(a) requirement that an inmate exhaust “such administrative remedies as are available” before bringing suit. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:59 am
United States and Kimbrough v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 12:10 pm
Presumably those difficulties are why all parties in Dobbs focused on the core issue of whether abortion is an unenumerated constitutional right, with the abortion providers (echoed by the United States) proclaiming that “there are no half-measures here. [read post]
10 Oct 2004, 12:56 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:30 am
"The federal court's March 31 decision in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 12:14 pm
United States in its special speedy issue on Rita. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:52 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 6:32 pm
United States Right to Enter Statutes – taking? [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:21 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2005, 8:20 am
During Oral Argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 11:40 am
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Opinions in Argued Cases THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Opinions in Argued Cases THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
