Search for: "Bland v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 404
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Council of Canadian Law Deans
The story of how Indigenous peoples were included within the state could be avoided with bland statements—such as, “there was from the outset never any doubt that sovereignty and legislative power, and indeed the underlying title, to [Aboriginal] lands vested in the Crown” (R v Sparrow, [1990] 1 SCR 1075, Dickson C.J. and La Forest J. at 1103). [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
  Regents and the Role of Reasoned Decisionmaking in Termination of Programs In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In its June 21, 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Ron DeSantis and a panel of scientists were discussing COVID, because it "contradicts the consensus of local and global health authorities regarding the efficacy of masks to prevent the spread of Covid-19″—the scientists apparently stated that children should not wear masks, and the CDC calls for children age 2 and above to wear masks.[57] But as recently as August 2020 the World Health Organization took a different view for 2-to-5-year-olds (which it said shouldn't… [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:15 am
Only days before, the Supreme Court had issued its decision in a case called Bowers v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:04 am by David Oscar Markus
” Harassment, intimidation, violence, and sometimes death, too often ensue.The Supreme Court opened the door to legally permissible racialized policing with the 1967 case Terry v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:08 am
In 1923, the Supreme Court decided in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:19 am by Josh Blackman
(Without comment, the court this week also denied a second case on the same issue, an appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Dalberiste v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:19 pm by Corynne McSherry
The Office also suggests the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Lenz v Universal Music was mistaken. [read post]