Search for: "Blatt v. Blatt" Results 61 - 80 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm by Ronald Mann
” Though Blatt insisted that her interpretation rested directly on the Supreme Court’s opinion in Barnett Bank v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The same reasoning applies to any claim that RFL aided and abetted fraud (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d at 700; Goel v Ramachandran, 111 AD3d 783, 792). [read post]
1 May 2023, 10:54 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, Lisa Blatt mentioned her brief by name during oral argument in Warhol v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
Under the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Nieves v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
At 10 a.m, the Court will hear argument in Winter, et al. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:12 pm by Don Maurice
I have today’s transcript from oral argument before the Supreme Court in Marx v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm by Kathryn Fort
The SG’s admittedly confusing position of claiming 1912(d) applies (what we know as active efforts, what Blatt characterized as an “exhaustion obligation” (page 8, line 11) and what Justice Kagan called the “curing provision” (page 58, line 14)), but 1912(f) does not (the heightened standard for termination of parental rights), the government may have done more harm than good. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A cause of action alleging a violation of Judiciary Law § 487 must be pleaded with specificity” (Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698 [2018]; see Sammy v Haupel, 170 AD3d 1224, 1225 [2019]). [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" Further, said the court, "The fact that causes of action may be stated separately, invoke different legal theories, or seek different relief will not permit relitigation of claims," citing Pondview Corp. v Blatt, 95 AD3d 980.The test applied to determine if an action is ripe for application of the doctrine of res judicata is a pragmatic one, involving an analysis of how the facts are related as to time, space, origin or motivation, whether they form a convenient… [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Since the defendants represented the plaintiff’s adversaries in a prior action, the causes of action alleging legal malpractice and negligence are unsupported by any duty running from the defendants to the plaintiff (see Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698; Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d 813, 815; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840; DeMartino v Golden, 150 AD3d 1200, 1201; Pasternack v Laboratory Corp.… [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:47 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Friday morning read: Marble Palace Blog: Celebrated as a Top SCOTUS Advocate, Lisa Blatt Laments ‘Appalling Disparity’ Among Lawyers Before the Court (Tony Mauro, The National Law Journal) The Supreme Court’s McGirt Dilemma (Editorial, The Wall Street Journal) The Holy Morality of the Supreme Court’s Most Sympathetic Plaintiffs (Dahlia Lithwick, Slate) Democrats Claim to Restore the Confidence in the Supreme Court That They Are Destroying (Thomas… [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
And then it is on to the argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by Dennis Crouch
  Roman Martinez (Latham Watkins) is set to argue for Warhol and Lisa Blatt (Williams Connolly) for Goldsmith. [read post]