Search for: "Blink Holdings, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2012, 10:12 pm
Well, we already knew that Proview was looking for/needed a big payout and were holding out for a much larger amount. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
Or perhaps they intend to engage in a game of "chicken" with the parish, to see who will blink first?) [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 9:44 pm
Given this, I wonder if we’ll start seeing (or not seeing) more IP holding companies? [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am
To understand why the Court’s holding in Concepcion could be so significant, it is important to understand how class-action bans come to be and why they are often disastrous for consumers and employees. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 4:30 am
McDonald’s Restaurants of Oregon, Inc., 892 P.2d 703 (Or.App. 1995) and Robertson v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 4:30 am
McDonald’s Restaurants of Oregon, Inc., 892 P.2d 703 (Or.App. 1995) and Robertson v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:44 am
Tough Mudder Inc. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 9:30 am
McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc., 892 P.2d 703 (Or.App. 1995) and Robertson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 3:52 am
Land O’ Lakes, Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:04 am
Wendy’s fast food restaurants were pinched by Phelan Holdings, Inc., which does business as Pincher’s Crab Shack and uses the federally registered service mark YOU CAN’T FAKE FRESH. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
., Inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
Pillsbury Flour Mills, Inc., 48 N.W.2d 735, 736 (Minn. 1951) Hertz v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:27 pm
The Su Âpreme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
President & Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:21 am
Public.Resource.Org, Inc., holding that Georgia could not claim a copyright in the annotations contained in its official code. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
") In Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 5:00 pm
This is definitely bad news for users and potential objectors. 30 days is too short a time for those objectors who are new to the process, who wish to organize new coalitions or to retain counsel for the first time, or to change counsel for any reason. 30 days is barely the blink of an eye in the typical timeline of a Copyright Board tariff, which can typically take about seven years or more to get to a decision. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:26 pm
Inc. (9th Cir. 1989) ("We agree with the Seventh Circuit that the permissibility of group libel claims [discussed in Beauharnais] is highly questionable at best. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:17 am
Almost as soon as he got started in his argument on behalf of Janus that Abood should be overruled, Justice Ginsburg queried William Messenger (National Right to Work Legal Foundation, Inc. [read post]
