Search for: "Blow v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 3,283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2009, 2:06 pm
What blows in the 2nd may not blow in the 9thTwo Fridays ago a San Jose California jury reached a verdict awarding statutory damages of US$32.4 million in favour of Louis Vuitton Malletier (LVMH) in a contributory trade mark and copyright infringement claim brought by the luxury good giant against California-based ISP webhosting operations company Akonac Solutions Inc. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:24 am by Adam Wagner
 Whilst this will be a blow to the partners of dodgy men or women who are trying to hide their assets, it does seem a potentially fair way of balancing competing rights. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:21 am by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
Of course, the Court reconsidered Roe back in 1992 in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm
  Beyond increasing the authority of the state against the employer, it does little to protect the employee against either employee or state for statements made or information conveyed that does not fall within the quite narrow and specific parameters represented by whistle blowing statutes (and the regulations thereunder. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:56 am
Finding there is a qualified privilege with respect to statements made after a whistle-blowing event defeats an employee's claim of slanderCusimano v United Health Servs. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:56 pm by Steve Brachmann
Supreme Court issued an order list showing that it had denied the petition for writ of certiorari filed in Juno Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:56 pm by Steve Brachmann
Supreme Court issued an order list showing that it had denied the petition for writ of certiorari filed in Juno Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]