Search for: "Blue Cross v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2009, 8:22 am
Superior Construction Corp: Motion for summary judgment by subcontractor on claim for breach of contract Derivative Actions Esquire Trade & Finance, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 7:29 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Most satisfying judicial decision (personal case load division): After approximately five years of litigation, including a week long jury trial, convincing the Pennsylvania Superior Court (for those of you not familiar with that state’s court system, the Superior Court is its intermediate appellate court) to not just reverse a $1.4 million verdict against my client, but to also enter judgment in favor of my client. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:43 am by Aaron Weems
 The Superior Court’s decision established the prohibition against the presence of outside observers during a neuropsychological evaluation and found good cause for the protective order. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:43 am by Aaron Weems
 The Superior Court’s decision established the prohibition against the presence of outside observers during a neuropsychological evaluation and found good cause for the protective order. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
After the parties cross-moved for judgment on the pleadings, the District Court granted Evanston’s motion, holding that 5-hour Energy’s complaint does not allege an Advertising Injury within the meaning of that term in the Policy. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:27 pm by Aaron Weems
Recently, any ambiguity was mostly removed when the Pennsylvania Supreme Court upheld the Superior Court’s decision through a split, 3-3 decision (an evenly divided court results in affirmation of the Superior Court decision). [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:58 pm by Peter Vodola
Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 447 Pa.Super. 436, 669 A.2d 975, 983 (Pa.Super.1995). * * * Significantly, the court has declared that causes of action in the nature of a penalty are not assignable. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 9:26 am by David Fraser
For that reason, we need clear rules so that this ability is only used where it is reasonable to do so, in accord with our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.This morning, the Ontario Superior Court released its important decision in R. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:05 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
For unpaid portions after 80% or under the deductible, the chiropractor and also patient should submit portions of bills the car insurance does not pay to their major medical carrier (ex- Blue Cross, Connecticut General). [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 9:49 am by Shea Denning
Combs appealed the order to superior court pursuant to G.S. 20-16.2(e). [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Blue Cross, 2021 ONSC 1485 (CanLII) 19) I would also recognize, as outlined in the factum of the defendant, that a judge alone trial raises the likelihood of a reserve decision. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 8:32 pm
Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Ala., 480 F.3d 1287, 1301 n.1 (11th Cir. 2007)With respect to the retaliation claim, this is where temporal proximity comes into play. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Keep an eye out for the Blue Brief on March 11, and the Red Brief on April 11.Shrine of Our Lady of LaSalette v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Keep an eye out for the Blue Brief on March 11, and the Red Brief on April 11.Shrine of Our Lady of LaSalette v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 11:27 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Keep an eye out for the Blue Brief on March 11, and the Red Brief on April 11.Shrine of Our Lady of LaSalette v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am by Schachtman
  Special did not file a protective cross-appeal. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:34 am
The trial court took the motion under advisement, and Tamko proceeded to cross-examine Dilloway. [read post]