Search for: "Blue Cross v. Superior Court" Results 41 - 60 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am by Schachtman
  Special did not file a protective cross-appeal. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:56 am
Blue Cross & Blue Shield Ass'n, 873 F.2d 1043, 1048 (7th Cir. 1989); cf. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:58 pm by Peter Vodola
Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield, 447 Pa.Super. 436, 669 A.2d 975, 983 (Pa.Super.1995). * * * Significantly, the court has declared that causes of action in the nature of a penalty are not assignable. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:34 am by Jared Klaus
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, No. 09-2607 (Aug. 12, 2011), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s decision to certify the class, which would have consisted of between 550 to 875 self-insured plans that entered into Administrative Services Contracts (“ASC’s”) with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (“BCBSM”). [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 5:06 pm by admin
Most recently, Superior Court Judge Stephen Bernstein reduced the award to the plaintiff attorneys from $6.5 million to $4.3 million. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 8:32 pm
Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Ala., 480 F.3d 1287, 1301 n.1 (11th Cir. 2007)With respect to the retaliation claim, this is where temporal proximity comes into play. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
FACTUAL and PROCEDURAL HISTORY Miracle Star, owned and operated by Jeffrey and Staretta Moffatt, provides drug and alcohol treatment and rehabilitation services at a location in Lancaster, California. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
  9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative settlement for costs associated with a removal action at the Anderson-Calhoun Mine and Mill Site in Leadpoint, Washington, with settling party Blue Tee Corporation. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On January 12, 2009, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division One) issued an order modifying its opinion and denying rehearing in a UCL public prosecutor case, Blue Cross of California, Inc. v. [read post]