Search for: "Blum v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014]… [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the career-offender sentencing guideline is unconstitutionally vague, and Jennings v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks how fully a judge must explain a sentencing modification. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
Raulin v Minister van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen Case C-357/89 states that duration of work is a finding of fact, but also supports taking the previous wok history into account. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:56 am by Andrew Hamm
He concludes that “Americans don’t agree on when the amendment was approved, and, I am sure, some in their hearts believe it should not bind the United States today. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a provision of the federal sex-offender act violates the nondelegation doctrine. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
United States Donald Trump is to claim presidential immunity in a defamation case brought against him by former contestant on the Apprentice who accused him of unwanted sexual contact. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a challenge to the constitutionality of an offense. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
The first was United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by admin
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am by Schachtman
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm by Schachtman
Susan Haack has written frequently about expert witness testimony in the United States legal system. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:57 pm by admin
Susan Haack has written frequently about expert witness testimony in the United States legal system. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
” The hosts of Words Matter (podcast) “sit down with Lauren Moxley, the host of The Ginsburg Tapes Podcast — which chronicles Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s oral arguments before the then all-male United States Supreme Court from 1972 to 1978 —before she became #Notorious RBG. [read post]