Search for: "Board of Public Instruction v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 1,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 6:15 am by Joy Waltemath
Curtiss-Wright Corp. to take the documents to support her civil suit, and no constitutional argument or public policy compelled dismissal of the indictment (State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Carr then instructed Lathus to write a "public statement on social media denouncing Antifa," and Lathus did so, believing that continuing in her "position on the … CPAB depended" on it. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:01 pm
For publication opinions today (1): In Paula Ann Yates v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am by Dennis Crouch
A school board president announces at a school board meeting that the board has lifted pandemic-era restrictions on public schools. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 12:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
Although several commissioners and librarians stated that they saw no problem with the books, Defendants Moss and Cunningham contacted Milum to instruct her to remove the books from the shelves. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:04 am
A state Supreme Court justice observed that New York State's public policy prohibits discrimination against persons who have committed a crime who have been rehabilitated. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 10:18 am
For publication opinions today (5): In Putnamville Correctional Facility v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
In a public corruption trial, the defense lawyer faces a significant hurdle: even if appropriate jury instructions are given (more on which below), the likelihood remains that jurors will assume that what might qualify as a state law ethics violation could also easily meet the requirements for the federal public corruption statutes. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Further, Petitioner had acknowledged her error in judgment and pledged to change her practices and never to repeat the error.Notwithstanding Petitioner's guilt of the charges misconduct filed against her, the Appellate Division ruled that under the circumstances the penalty of termination shocked its sense of fairness and applied the so-called Pell Doctrine [see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233. [read post]