Search for: "Board v. Board" Results 21 - 40 of 45,430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 3:33 am by sally
Regina (McGetrick) v Parole Board and another [2012] EWHC 882 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 114 “When considering and making its substantive recommendation on the question of the early release or recall of prisoners on licence following a reference to it by the Secretary of State for Justice, the Parole Board was ‘dealing with the case’ within the meaning of section 239(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and was therefore required to consider all the documents… [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:26 pm by admin
On February 9, 2012 a Revised Scheduling Order was issued and a Notice of Motion was filed by The Toronto Real Estate Board (“TREB”) in the ongoing Commissioner of Competition v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 2:43 am
Relationship too close for independence of board Regina (Brooke and Another) v Parole Board and Others Regina (O'Connell) v Same Regina (Murphy) v Same Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The Parole Board's relationship with central government was such that it did not have sufficient independence to carry out its role of reviewing the continued detention of prisoners lawfully, as required by common law and article 5.4 of… [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:05 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Board of Education made headlines, not only in American newspapers, but also around the world. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:43 am
R (Marrion and others) v Board of Medical Referees and others [2009] EWCA Civ 450; [2009] WLR (D) 135 “Where a firefighter applied for a disability pension, the question to be resolved by the independent qualified medical practitioner and on appeal by the Board of Medical Referees under the Firefighters' Pension Scheme was whether the firefighter [...] [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:35 am
Dunn v Parole Board [2008] EWCA Civ 374; [2008] WLR (D) 110 “In the context of CPR Pt 11, the limitation provisions within s 7(5) of the Human Rights Act 1998 provided a defence to a claim rather than going to jurisdiction, so that a failure to apply to strike out within 14 days of acknowledging service did not preclude a defendant from applying to strike out a claim on the basis of limitation. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Narendra Ghosh
The Fourth Circuit published an opinion in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]