Search for: "Bobbitt v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Rev.709 (1994).And indeed In League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:27 am
Alabi, supra.Alabi then moved to suppressall the fruits of the encounter, alleging Bobbitt's racially motivated pursuit of the vehicle violated his equal protection rights under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 7:34 am by Robert Black
On Monday, the first day of the new Supreme Court term, the Court heard argument in Kahler v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
It's one thing to say, as the Court mistakenly said in Alden v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Texas (state may not prohibit homosexual acts between consenting adults), Mapp v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
Tribe then responded to Bobbitt’s counterargument. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Philip Bobbitt’s theory of interpretive modalities is of this kind. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Or progressives might employ what Tara Leigh Grove calls “flexible textualism” to insist that the state attend to the functional preconditions for the realization of enumerated rights, as when the plaintiffs in San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:18 am by Garrett Hinck
Philip Bobbitt argued that North Korea has misunderstood the United States’ disincentives to push for regime change in Pyongyang. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:32 am by Victoria Clark
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck covered Zaidan v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
I recommend Bobbitt, Dorf, and Strauss.Good luck in your new career!! [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 11:46 am by Andrew Kent
" I disagreed with that—perhaps not clearly enough—by making a point that Chief Justice Rehnquist had in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am by JB
They wanted to use originalism to overturn Plessy v. [read post]