Search for: "Book v. Arnold" Results 1 - 20 of 308
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2022, 3:51 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 The book is presented in 11 chapters. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Brian Arnold has recently co-authored a book on divorce that can be purchased on Amazon and through Barnes and Noble. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:33 am by Brian Scott
Craig Williams, a partner with Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP (www.sdma.com), the case is Jordan Scott v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Williams discusses Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement Before Roe v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 12:16 pm
In short the claimant, Dame Vivienne Westwood, was throwing the book at the defendant, an internet trader in fashion goods who doing a poor imitation of a small litigant representing himself. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:13 am
To his acute embarrassment, the IPKat has only just, and rather belatedly, got round to reviewing the fourth edition of Performers' Rights by Richard Arnold (now Mr Justice Arnold, of the Patents Court for England and Wales). [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:50 am
Issuing an unambiguous final decision indicating that all administrative appeals have been exhausted triggers the running of the statute of limitationsMatter of Janet Arnold, et al v Erie County Med. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:28 am by INFORRM
Background The applicant, Mr Éric Zemmour, is a French journalist and commentator, who has published several books. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 1:40 pm
* Mr Justice Arnold rejects bid to hear infringement of German designation in Rhodia v Molycorp patent jurisdiction tussleAmerikat Annesley Merelle Ward explains why Mr Justice Arnold rejected a claim to consider infringement of a German designation in Rhodia v Molycorp. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:44 am by Léon Dijkman
Here, the Court takes an interesting approach that combines, as it were, its Orange Book formula and the test in Huawei v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 2:14 pm by Peter Groves
A literary work is an abstract matter, separate from but related to the book in which it is printed. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:05 pm
As we head into a hot holiday weekend, here are some appellate items to explore:Today's DJ has Justice Moore's piece on Jackie Robinson, United States v. 2LT Jack R Robinson as well as Marc Alexander's book review: Notorious RBG Talks Life, Love, Liberty, and LawThe Recorder's On Appeals column has Katy Graham's The Far-Reaching Effects of a Landmark Decision on the Standard of Appellate Review for Clear and Convincing Evidence.Tuesday's… [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
Blame old geezers like me | Mr Justice Arnold to become Lord Justice Arnold: congratulations! [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
* Arnold J's latest judgment flags down the iconic (but not distinctive) London black cabMr Justice Arnold addresses the issue of whether the iconic London cab can be a trade mark in The London Taxi Corporation Limited trading as the London Taxi Company v (1) Frazer-Nash Research Limited and (2) Ecotive Limited [2016] EWHC 52 (Ch). [read post]