Search for: "Bostock v. Clayton County" Results 81 - 100 of 521
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Clayton County, in which the Court--in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch joined by the Democratic appointees as well as Chief Justice Roberts--held that discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity is sex discrimination under Title VII. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
” The Education Department’s interpretation of Title IX stems from Bostock v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 12:06 pm by Tom Smith
Clayton County, which held that LGBTQ employees are protected from discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
” For a slightly more detailed explanation, I’ll defer to Commissioner Lucas: “[EEOC] Chair Burrows unilaterally issued the ‘technical assistance’ document addressing the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Zoe Stern
Bass warned that the Supreme Court could overturn Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 9:17 am by Tom Smith
With the introduction of SSI, the current incarnation of the LGBTQ+ network—as distinct from the prior movement that fought for equal rights for gay and lesbian Americans, and which ended in 2020 with Bostock v. [read post]
In the order, Judge Marc Treadwell cites the US Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in <u>Bostock v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
That was the clear message of the Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]