Search for: "Bowens v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2006, 7:01 am
Bowen v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 5:46 am
Further, simply having one's name on the title could indicate liability, at least according to a recent decision by the Florida Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 9:09 am
A California superior court has issued this tentative decision in a dispute between San Diego and Secretary of State Bowen about post-election audits.... [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
” This Court finds the superiority and predominance requirements of Rule 23(b) (3) are not satisfied. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 8:38 am
In Christensen v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Cal. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 3:00 pm
(David Kopel) The Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Millender v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:31 pm
The Washington Supreme Court reversed the lower Court of Appeals decision upholding a jury verdict in the Salas v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:33 pm
Supreme Court in a single case: Reisch v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:44 am
That was the Court’s holding Wednesday in Messerschmidt v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:44 am
In Messerschmidt v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 2:27 pm
Williams v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 5:02 pm
The suit, D'Arelli v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 9:00 am
The Supreme Court granted certiorari on two issues: whether the en banc Ninth Circuit properly applied Malley v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 12:21 pm
” A quick Westlaw search returned Bowen v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:21 am
The Superior Court, King County, 2006 WL 3193619,Michael C. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:19 am
On December 5, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Messerschmidt v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 1:45 pm
A state Superior Court found in favor of the CA SoS but a Court of Appeal found that the PEMT Requirements did indeed betray characteristics of regulations and should therefore have gone through the regulatory procedure (for the legal eagles out there, see: County of San Diego v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 7:41 am
For example, I have a great deal of thoughts about whether the Court of Appeal could preferably have taken an entirely different (and arguably superior) approach to the one that's articulated by Justice Richman, and instead of holding that the "exception" of Section 2 negated the underlying equal protection claim, the Court of Appeal might alternatively have held that even if the exception does not apply, the equal protection claim nonetheless fails on the… [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
The reason for this Suffolk Superior Court appeal is that (d) in this regulation was misinterpreted by the Hearing Officer after it was recklessly misrepresented by the Office of Medicaid. [read post]
