Search for: "Brady v. Department of Personnel"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2014, 6:37 am
Here's the abstract from the paper:The Supreme Court’s pronouncements in Brady v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:44 am
Nonetheless, in People v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 5:53 am
In such a system, the police department purports to search all the personnel files for anything that could be Brady material. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 4:04 pm
Supreme Court’s holding in Brady v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:36 am
The federal constitution, as interpreted by Brady v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:57 am
In Kyles v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 2:50 pm
However, Section 3505.5 will not prohibit an agency from taking disciplinary action, or some other personnel action, against a peace officer for the underlying acts or omissions for which that officer’s name is placed on a Brady list, or is otherwise subject to disclosure under Brady v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:38 am
Superior Court (Johnson) considered the interplay between the United States Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 9:28 am
To facilitate compliance with Brady v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:41 pm
Based on this unfair and unwarranted perception, Brady's supervisor stripped him of his pharmacy assistant functions and transferred him to the personnel department. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:03 pm
Thus, in the 1963 case Brady v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
It is well-established that prosecutors have an obligation to disclose to the defense information that tends to exculpate the accused (Brady v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:26 pm
Thompson, which asks whether cities can be held liable under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for failure to train personnel, based on a single so-called Brady violation — a reference to Brady v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
§3500), Brady v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:07 am
To answer that question, one must recall the passage of the Michael Morton Act by the Texas Legislature in 2013, which strengthened requirements that prosecutors disclose exculpatory, mitigating, and impeachment evidence beyond minimalist requirements in federal precedents under Brady v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:53 pm
Keker will assist the District Attorney’s Office in assessing any potential impact future disclosures from the San Francisco Police Department about the misconduct and criminal history of San Francisco Police Department personnel may have on the cases which have already been adjudicated. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 3:15 am
Supreme Court case in which the due process requirement was identified, Brady v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:21 am
The panel held that the state court’s failure to comply with Brady v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 7:07 am
Besides the scope of the Brady decision, the new review will no doubt examine the impact on ranking prosecutorial officials of Giglio v. [read post]
16 Feb 2019, 8:05 am
Under Brady v. [read post]
