Search for: "Brady v. Department of Personnel"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2016, 5:44 am
Nonetheless, in People v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:57 am
In Kyles v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:36 am
The federal constitution, as interpreted by Brady v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 9:28 am
To facilitate compliance with Brady v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:55 am
And I guess a more articulate way of thinking about it is that Brady v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:38 am
Superior Court (Johnson) considered the interplay between the United States Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 6:37 am
Here's the abstract from the paper:The Supreme Court’s pronouncements in Brady v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 2:50 pm
However, Section 3505.5 will not prohibit an agency from taking disciplinary action, or some other personnel action, against a peace officer for the underlying acts or omissions for which that officer’s name is placed on a Brady list, or is otherwise subject to disclosure under Brady v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:21 am
The panel held that the state court’s failure to comply with Brady v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:03 am
Supreme Court ruled in Brady v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 4:03 am
Supreme Court ruled in Brady v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 5:00 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Brady v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:39 am
Bruce Saffran in Saffran, M.D., Ph.D., v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:26 pm
Thompson, which asks whether cities can be held liable under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for failure to train personnel, based on a single so-called Brady violation — a reference to Brady v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:53 pm
Keker will assist the District Attorney’s Office in assessing any potential impact future disclosures from the San Francisco Police Department about the misconduct and criminal history of San Francisco Police Department personnel may have on the cases which have already been adjudicated. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
Defense Department v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:35 am
Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and the Women’s Sports Foundation (WSF) all have their own definition of “sport” that a competitive cheerleading squad could possibly qualify under.[6] The question also brings up other issues that would need to be addressed. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously evaluated a Brady… [read post]
