Search for: "Bransten v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
 Justice Bransten ruled that the Court had personal jurisdiction over the defendant-corporation under CPLR 302(a)(1) (transacting business in the State) and 302(a)(2) (committing a tortious act in the State). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:40 am
Availability of a record essential in reviewing administrative determinations Gumb v Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, NYS Supreme Court, Ia Part 6, Justice Bransten [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports.] [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 The Bransten v State of New York decisionIn September 2011 the New York State Department of Civil Service notified sitting judges that the State would reduce its contributions for health insurance premiums by 6% and reduce its contributions to retired judges' health insurance premiums by 2%. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Earlier this month, Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Eileen Bransten issued a ruling in Zacharius v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Amendment to Civil Service Law §167(8) does not violate the compensation clause for certain judges set out in Article VI, §25[a] of the State Constitution Bransten v State of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 08168, Court of AppealsIn 2011 the State-employee unions, in the course of collective bargaining, agreed to a percentage reduction to the State's employer contributions for health insurance to avoid layoff, salary freezes and unpaid… [read post]
7 May 2013, 2:03 pm by Editorial Board
On April 29, Justice Eileen Bransten of the New York State Supreme Court issued an opinion granting in part and denying in part competing motions for summary judgment filed by MBIA and Countrywide in connection with tort and contract claims MBIA asserted concerning its insurance policies wrapping certain Countrywide RMBS. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:07 am by Peter Mahler
I recently had the privilege of speaking to an audience of judges of the New York Supreme Court Commercial Division at Fordham Law School’s Eileen Bransten Institute on Complex Commercial Litigation. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Although §27 does not define the term "salary," the Appellate Division noted that in Bransten v State of New York, 30 NY3d 434 the Court of Appeals, considering the State Constitution's Judicial Compensation Clause, Article VI, §25[a], and held that the state's employer contributions toward a justice's health insurance coverage "is not part of [his or her] judicial salary" nor considered "a… [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Although §27 does not define the term "salary," the Appellate Division noted that in Bransten v State of New York, 30 NY3d 434 the Court of Appeals, considering the State Constitution's Judicial Compensation Clause, Article VI, §25[a], and held that the state's employer contributions toward a justice's health insurance coverage "is not part of [his or her] judicial salary" nor considered "a… [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 6:28 pm by Peter Moulinos
Eileen Bransten and is captioned Group Health Solutions Inc. v. [read post]