Search for: "Bray v. Andrews" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2016, 11:05 am by Amanda Frost
Although Bray thinks that this “doomsday scenario” is unlikely, it is easy to imagine in the wake of United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The Delaware Chancery Court recently preliminarily enjoined a stockholders meeting in Bray v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
The trouble with duress: the dissent of Chief Justice Bray in R v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:24 am
Christoph Schreuer, Víctor Pey Casado and President Allende Foundation v Republic of Chile: Barely an Annulment ArticlesCarolyn B. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
Equity's concern with the protection of information can be seen as far back as 1818 and the canonical case of Gee v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
[A reply to Professor Andrew Koppelman] In the Arizona Law Review, Professor Andrew Koppelman asks the provocative question Why Do (Some) Originalists Hate America? [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 3:11 pm
It might seem a bit ironic that the lawyer, Andrew Weissmann (pictured, center), once headed the Enron Task Force and helped bring charges against Arthur Andersen. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:53 am by Jordan Brunner
Samuel Bray presented the case against national injunctions by federal courts. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Samuel Bray looks at Putnam Investments, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Rosales-Mireles v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm by Andrew Kent
  Forum Shopping Bray and others have noted that nationwide injunctions are especially problematic when plaintiffs can successfully forum shop to raise the likelihood of a favorable ruling. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
At The Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Sam Bray points out that the “Supreme Court said two interesting things about equity [last] week”; he notes that “the takeaway from the court’s opinion” in an election-law case, North Carolina v. [read post]