Search for: "Brink v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 5:15 pm by Lovechilde
Maybe they will surprise us all on Thursday and step back from the brink. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” This is the turn in religious liberty discourse and doctrine that the United States has needed since RFRA was first passed in 1993. [read post]
1 May 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
A big case was argued this week before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:43 am
Langdell was a United States resident and the first and second defendant companies were incorporated in the United States. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 12:09 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Susan Illston, Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California Aton Arbisser, Kaye Scholer LLP Elizabeth J. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 4:49 am by Bernard Bell
But, the panel observe, non-state plaintiffs were not entitled to the same solicitude. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:14 pm by Schachtman
United States, 346 F.2d 52, 54 (5th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 976 (1966). 615 F. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:30 pm by Emily Prifogle
” The result is a sweeping rereading of American history that emphasizes the need to understand immigration and the United States in global perspectives. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm by Sandy Levinson
  So, understandably, some people believe that states could limit the agenda of an Article V convention. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
United States The manager of a New York City Shake Shack restaurant said he was unlawfully detained by police and “taunted” after he was falsely accused last year of poisoning three officers’ milkshakes. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the justices ruled 5-4 yesterday that a state-law robbery conviction can qualify as a “violent felony” for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act even when the conviction does not require the use of violent force. [read post]