Search for: "Britain v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2023, 3:43 am
This was the case in R v Rogers [2014] EWCA Crim 1680, where there was no act of money laundering in England but it was sufficient that the underlying fraud generating the criminal property took place in England and there were English victims. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 7:51 am
In fact, the authors of this article are aware of only one such decision, in which they participated — Schaeffer v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 5:11 pm
Our starting place is Entick v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am
As stated, the rules require one intending to apply for asylum to first obtain an appointment. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 1:39 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
Cf Bush v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:44 am
R (on the application of Toraane and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 23. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am
R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 21. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
Circuit explained in its 1980 FTC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:50 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 2:26 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
The ICO released a statement in response, stating that it does not share the views of the report. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
In truth Campbell had appeared on talk show Good Morning Britain and said “The offence with which [Epstein] was charged and for which he was imprisoned, was ‘soliciting prostitution from minors’. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March… [read post]
