Search for: "Brooks v. Superior Court"
Results 101 - 120
of 199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2017, 3:08 pm
Stony Brook University). [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Panelists include: Cristina V. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 3:12 am
Jepson held that rent repayment orders cannot be made against a superior landlord (for example in a ‘rent to rent’ situation) but this case is due to be appealed to the Supreme Court next year. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
Family Court granted petitioner’s application. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
At trial, plaintiff alleged that the City was liable under a respondeat superior theory for Miller's negligence in shooting plaintiff and for the police department's negligence in planning the raid. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
At trial, plaintiff alleged that the City was liable under a respondeat superior theory for Miller's negligence in shooting plaintiff and for the police department's negligence in planning the raid. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:32 am
In Canada, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded Can $50,000 general damages and Can$25,000 punitive damages in an internet defamation case. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
In Anderson v Anderson, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2023 WL 8246131, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 6:28 am
The superior court granted the DOC’s motion, and Mr. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:14 pm
Cal), Galvez v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:14 pm
Cal), Galvez v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
Brooks and Bruce T. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Wood, Supervising Judge of the Matrimonial Part of the Westchester County Supreme Court, in his December 17, 2013 decision in Medina v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:19 am
Superior Court Judge Edward Torack should have alerted the husband's attorney that he and William Smith's professional relationship had resulted in litigation over the judge's departure from the firm 11 years earlier, and Smith should have alerted the court and opposing counsel that he could not give assurance that his client would not seek the judge's recusal, the Appellate Division held in Chandok v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
C.A.), Brooke J.A. stated: The question of when and in what circumstances the court may order such a sale was considered broadly by Grant J. in Cook v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:15 pm
x Consumer Law and Policy Blog reports: In a closely watched case, the California Supreme Court on Thursday issued a decision preserving the broad availability of the state’s principal consumer protection laws in cases involving mislabeled goods.The question at issue in Kwikset v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 4:06 pm
Canada In the case of Goldhar v Haaretz.com et al., 2015 ONSC 1128 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that Ontario was the proper forum for a defamation against an Israeli newspaper. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:01 am
ApotexThe logic of this interesting provision is along the exact lines of the opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in the case of Pfizer v. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:18 pm
These opinions are alleged to be defamatory and are the subject of an action in the Superior Court of Ontario. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Default as a strategy Brooke v. [read post]
