Search for: "Brooks v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2010, 4:46 am
Section 1071(b) of the TTAB's October 30, 2009 ruling in Christopher Brooks v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:55 am
Half the monetary penalty goes to the person who instituted the suit and the other half goes to the United States government. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 4:07 am
Qurate Retail, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:19 am
Brooks stated that he has "no idea" whether the Supreme Court will take on Prince v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:28 am
First, in McCulloch v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 7:30 am
Brooks, No. 4:09cv86 in the Newport News Division of United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 9:58 am
In its review, the Federal Circuit applied the rule from Brooks Furniture Mfg., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 9:00 pm
Event Announcements (More details on the Events Calendar) Mon, April 14 – Thurs, April 17: United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 3:00 pm
This event is sponsored by the Georgetown Law Supreme Court Institute, The Ohio State University Election Law@Moritz and the AEI-Brookings Election Reform Project. [read post]
6 May 2007, 10:46 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:16 pm
Add to that set of precedents United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 4:52 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 7:38 am
Administrative law — Maryland Insurance Administration — Substantial evidence Appellants Samuel McCollum and Cathy Brooks-McCollum filed an administrative complaint against appellee State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company with the Property and Casualty Unit of the Maryland Insurance Administration (“MIA”), alleging violations of the Unfair Claim Settlement Practices Act of the Insurance Article and challenging ... [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 5:40 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm
USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 270–71 (1994) (collecting cases); see also United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am
(b) Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 12:32 pm
United States, a major Fourth Amendment case asking whether a warrant is necessary before law enforcement can obtain cell site data identifying a suspect phone's location from a service provider. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:00 am
Following up on my previous posts: John Brooks (Fordham) & David Gamage (Indiana-Maurer), Moore v. [read post]
