Search for: "Brown v. Maxwell"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
Here is the opinion in Brown v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:35 am
Lords Brown and Collins dissented. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:41 am
The Privy Council grappled with this question in Warren v Attorney General of Jersey [2011] UKPC 10, an abuse of process case in which the facts were similar to those in Maxwell. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:16 am
With the sixtieth anniversary of the Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 10:31 am
Radar Online v. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 7:34 am
It does so in the context of highly-publicized sexual misconduct allegations involving some well-known individuals, including Alan Dershowitz.The case is Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 4:31 am
Maintaining its recent record of coming out ahead of its cover date, the July 2007 issue of Sweet & Maxwell's monthly IP flagship journal, the European Intellectual Property Review, still edited by its originator Hugh Brett, has some highly timely and topical content. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:39 am
For example, this op ed in the WSJ attempts to challenge the constitutionality of the legal tool that civil rights activists used to dismantle Jim Crow in public schools (via Brown v. [read post]
26 May 2007, 4:23 pm
Gordon Brown raised billions this way. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:44 am
(Id. at p. 657; Maxwell v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 5:30 am
Supreme Court survive overturning Roe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:57 am
Last month’s decision of the US Supreme Court in Brown v Entertainment Merchants’ Association (PDF) (formerly Schwarzenegger v VSDA) has attracted a lot of attention. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:36 pm
EPA and Mayo v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
This is the concluding part of a paper delivered at the JUSTICE/Sweet and Maxwell Human Rights conference on 20 October 2010. [read post]
30 May 2010, 3:55 pm
Kellogg, Brown & Root Service, Inc., and Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 7:31 am
Other examples cited were the case of fraud involving former employees of the Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS) in 2017, and the 2005 SFO investigation into systematic fraud involving the Sweet and Maxwell publishers. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:00 am
And in Green v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
It will also publish the judgment in R v Maxwell in which it was decided on 17 November 2010 that this appeal should be dismissed. [read post]
