Search for: "Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm by Amanda Traphagan
Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, and Lorillard – alleging that the Big Four engaged in misleading practices. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 7:21 am by Brian Toth
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 363 F.3d 1183, 1187 (11th Cir. 2004). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm by Josh Blackman
Cir. 2020), and cites to several cases permitting federal officer removal for elected members of Congress, see Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 4:30 am by Dan Eller
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000), wherein the Supreme Court held that tobacco products were not subject to FDA regulation as a drug or device.The Smoking Everywhere court rejected the FDA's arguments that the term "tobacco product" should be narrowly defined and that e-cigarettes were drug-device combinations. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 5:18 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 125 (2000) (quoting ETSI Pipeline Project v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 8:14 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., a smoker's wrongful death lawsuit, in which the decedent's estate was awarded $20,000,000 in punitive damages. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2014) (citing Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:28 am
  The Appellate Division, after noting that it is “well-settled law that an arbitration award will be vacated only where ‘it is violative of a strong public policy, or is totally irrational, or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on [the arbitrator's] power,’ citing Matter of Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v Chesley, 7 AD3d 368, decided that in this instance the Department’s arguments met this test. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:16 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 139 (2000) (where Congress “reveal[ed] its intent that tobacco products remain on the market . [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
Cir. 2006) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. [read post]