Search for: "Brown v. Secretary of Health & Human Services"
Results 61 - 80
of 85
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
Ray Raphael Here we go again. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 5:08 pm
The Dickey Amendment prohibits the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which includes the NIH, from funding research where human embryos are destroyed. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:57 pm
This is the most recent decision in the dispute between U.S. researchers in the field of adult stem cells, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
To be sure, Bickel was more than willing to defend Brown v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 2:17 pm
Secretary of [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:08 pm
Cornyn’s amendment would have amended the law to state: Notwithstanding any other provision of State or Federal law, a person who manufacturers a generic drug approved under an [ANDA] shall not be liable because the label did not warn against an adverse reaction, unless the [FDA] required a change to the label to provide such warnings and the manufacturer failed to comply with such requirement, or the manufacturer failed to provide to the [FDA] health and safety information otherwise… [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:51 am
This embraced research on human subjects, lung tissue and experimental animals. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 – 20 July 2011. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Certiorari stage documents:Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition of Humane Society of America et al.Brief in opposition of Edmund Brown et al.Petitioner's supplemental briefAmicus brief of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians et al.Petitioner's reply CVSG Information:Invited: January 18, 2011Filed: May 26, 2011 (Deny) Title: Brown v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
Departments of Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services have released guidance on how employer-sponsored self-funded group health plans can satisfy the new external claims review requirements arising from the federal health care reform legislation.The top five employee benefits and executive compensation traps in M&A transactionsMcDermott Will & EmeryIn M&A transactions, many lawyers (and clients) assume that employee benefits issues are… [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:12 pm
Leroy V, Inc. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm
" [...] [49D Power to impose specific duties] [(1) The Secretary of State may by regulations impose on a public authority, other than a relevant Scottish authority or a cross-border authority, such duties as the Secretary of State considers appropriate for the purpose of ensuring the better performance by that authority of its duty under section 49A(1).. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm
" [...] [49D Power to impose specific duties] [(1) The Secretary of State may by regulations impose on a public authority, other than a relevant Scottish authority or a cross-border authority, such duties as the Secretary of State considers appropriate for the purpose of ensuring the better performance by that authority of its duty under section 49A(1).. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
For this stent, the Secretary of Health and Human Services decided that the "primary mode of action" of this combination product was to fulfill a "device function. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
