Search for: "Bryson v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2007, 9:31 am
Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), the case that essentially applied Baker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division concurred with the Supreme Court’s ruling noting that “The giving of false statements in the course of an official investigation has been upheld as a ground for dismissal from municipal employment," citing Duncan v Kelly, 43 AD3d 297, affirmed 9 NY3d 1024.As the United States Supreme Court held in Bryson v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm by Donald Thompson
A criminal investigation counts (see, United States v Rodgers, 466 US 475 [1984]). [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Interestingly, even though in dissent, Judge Bryson agreed that the "Supreme Court's recent decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:13 am
 So here's a summary of my most significant blog posts on the CVD/NME issue and the court case (GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:33 am by Hans Sauer
Insiders React to Supreme Court Prometheus DecisionJust over three weeks ago the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 2:16 pm
" Judge Bryson's short concurrence opinion stated that decision was correct in light of BMC, Muniauction, and Akamai, but questioned whether the three cases were themselves correct, and expressed the opinion that an en banc review might be needed to resolve the issue. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:06 pm
" Judge Bryson's short concurrence opinion stated that decision was correct in light of BMC, Muniauction, and Akamai, but questioned whether the three cases were themselves correct, and expressed the opinion that an en banc review might be needed to resolve the issue. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am by Conor McEvily
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]