Search for: "Burden v. Secretary of Health and Human Services" Results 1 - 20 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2011, 10:05 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
CARVONDELLA BRADLEY,  et. al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus SECRETARY, U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT2011 U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Department of Health and Human Services, (3d Cir., Feb. 11, 2015), the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Obama administration's accommodation under the Affordable Care Act for religious non-profits that object to furnishing contraceptive coverage. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm by admin
Section 1135 Waiver Issues and COVID-19 (March 25, 2020):  On January 31, 2020, Secretary Alex Azar, of the US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), used his authority under the Public Health Service Act to declare a public health emergency in the United States.[1] Secretary Azar determined that a public health emergency had existed nationwide since January 27, 2020. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:00 am by Record on Appeal
Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services et al., No. 11-393 (June 28, 2011) or Obamacare. [read post]
23 May 2007, 6:03 am by Denese Dominguez
Department of Health and Human Services a plan detailing how the State will expend federal funds. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 12:38 pm by Paul King Jr
  In addition, Secretary Walsh did not mince his words in declaring that the Biden Administration will pursue enforcement actions as necessary to ensure that health plan participants receive unimpeded access to contraceptive coverage without the burden of sharing in associated costs. [read post]
Regulators provided key insights into enforcement trends and potential changes to HIPAA regulations at the 11th Annual “Safeguarding Health Information: Building Assurance Through HIPAA Security” conference in October co-hosted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office for Civil Rights (OCR). [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 12:18 pm by Mark Zamora
The Secretary's position compels plaintiffs to force their tort claims to trial, burdening the court system. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
And on March 6, Huawei and its U.S. subsidiary sued the U.S. government and the secretaries of labor, health and human services, education, agriculture, veterans affairs, and the interior, as well as the administrator of the General Services Administration. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 3:03 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Secretary of the Executive Office of Health and Human Services and had forced the issue to be remanded) all of a sudden became concerned about fairness to litigants opposing large, well-funded entities, writing: “Not only is the remand unnecessary, but it also is unfair to the plaintiffs. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) is authorized to promulgate regulations establishing the requirements for the medical examination of aliens by sections 212(a)(1) and 232 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), and section 325 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 252). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Therefore the same derogations apply – Member States may impose quantitative restrictions on exports on grounds of “public morality”, “the protection of health and life of humans” and so on. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
Burwell, (S.Ct., July 3, 2014), in an unsigned order the court held:If the applicant informs the Secretary of Health and Human Services in writing that it is a nonprofit organization that holds itself out as religious and has religious objections to providing coverage for contraceptive services, the respondents are enjoined from enforcing against the applicant the challenged provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and related… [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Businesses, individuals, states and federal and state Congressional and regulatory leaders others looking for opportunities to manage these costs should carefully scrutinize how the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) plans to define “essential health benefits” (EHBs). [read post]