Search for: "Burks v. U. S" Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2014, 9:57 am by Gregory J. Brodzik
Burkes recommendation from earlier this month, in which Judge Burke recommended denial of a defendant’s motion to transfer to the Northern District of California. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:37 am by Samantha G. Wilson
Burke recommended denial of defendant’s renewed motion to transfer to the Northern District of California. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 3:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Heth v Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP  2019 NY Slip Op 30555(U)  March 5, 2019  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 650379/2015  Judge: Andrew Borrok demonstrates what happens when the client possibly  discusses how attorney 1 is handling the case with attorney 2. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Burke PC v Aezah 2017 NY Slip Op 32670(U) December 14, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 654778/2016 Judge: David B. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:06 am by Steve Bainbridge
Under the Act, scrutiny of investment adviser compensation by a fully informed mutual fund board, see Burks v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 3:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Roedelbronn v Borstein & Sheinbaum LLC  2022 NY Slip Op 31434(U) May 3, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 158045/2020 Judge: William Perry is a rare divorce legal malpractice case that has actionable facts which give rise to provable damages. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Alphas v Smith  2022 NY Slip Op 30722(U) March 7, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155790/2015 Judge: Lewis J. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” CPLR Rule 3216 may be used to dismiss counterclaims (see Burke, Albright, Harter & Rzepka LLP v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:18 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
Under the Act, scrutiny of investment adviser compensation by a fully informed mutual fund board, see Burks v. [read post]