Search for: "Burlington Northern v. Fail" Results 1 - 20 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2009, 9:34 am
I’ve written about the Shell Oil finding in the case of Burlington Northern and Sante Fe Railroad Co., et al. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2006, 6:16 pm
It's a retaliation case that cites to Burlington Northern v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
If you handle retaliation claims, you are familiar with the test in Burlington Northern v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 2:07 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Burlington and Northern Santa Fe Railroad Company decided that a juror's blog posts (Green Room) made during trial were insufficient grounds to overturn a $4.5 million verdict. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 12:29 pm by Robby Sanoff
Indeed, I blogged several years ago on the reluctance of the Seventh Circuit to follow Burlington Northern in connection with the Lower Fox River Superfund matter. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:04 am by Sean Wajert
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp., No. 08-10-00169-CV (Tex. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The Northern District of California had found U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:15 am by WIMS
The case concerns the construction of a new Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) rail/truck terminal outside Kansas City, Kansas. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:19 am by Chuck Becker
The Fifth Circuit reviewed the United States Supreme Court case of Burlington Northern  v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 5:26 am by Thomas J. Crane
It relied on the decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:39 am
Likewise, Plaintiff's retaliation claim failed even though a clever attempt to use the expanded definition of "adverse employment action" under Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Ry. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 1:18 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmploymentWorkplace Retaliation Suit Survives Dismissal Motion Under Broader 'Burlington Northern' Standard Moore v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by Joshua Matz
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]