Search for: "Burrows v. Burrows"
Results 41 - 60
of 314
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2023, 1:41 pm
Texas v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:43 am
The plaintiffs’ “hindsight criticism of counsels’ reasonable course of action . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d at 758 [citation and internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
As Lord Burrows pointed out at [5], in the Christian Brothers case – Catholic Child Welfare Society & Ors v Various Claimants & The Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools & Ors [2012] UKSC 5 – Lord Phillips had said at [19] that the law of vicarious liability was “on the move”. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am
“The fact that the plaintiff subsequently was unhappy with the settlement [she] obtained . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; Holschauer v Fisher, 5 AD3d 553, 554). [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:19 am
The main decision in this regard is Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony where the US Supreme Court confirmed that an author is “he to whom anything owes its origin; originator; maker; one who completes a work of science or literature”, which specifically can only be a human author. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:19 am
The main decision in this regard is Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony where the US Supreme Court confirmed that an author is “he to whom anything owes its origin; originator; maker; one who completes a work of science or literature”, which specifically can only be a human author. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 7:29 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
The USCO emphasizes that authorship has to be limited to the creations of “human authors”, according to some US case-law dating back to 1884 (Supreme Court Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:11 am
Dissenting judgments Interestingly, a fundamental reason why Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows disagreed with the majority, is that they viewed the meaning of silence in the contract in a very different way. [read post]
New Judgment: Barton and others v Morris and another in place of Gwyn-Jones (deceased) [2022] UKSC 3
25 Jan 2023, 2:39 am
Dissenting judgments Lord Leggatt and Lord Burrows dissent and would both dismiss the appeal. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:57 am
” For example, in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
By Atreya Mathur Credit: DALL·E 2; text prompts (left to right): painting of a robot holding justice scales; painting of a robot-artist painting flowers; painting of a robot reading a law bookWhat does it take to be an artist in the 21st century? [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
By Atreya Mathur Credit: DALL·E 2; text prompts (left to right): painting of a robot holding justice scales; painting of a robot-artist painting flowers; painting of a robot reading a law bookWhat does it take to be an artist in the 21st century? [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
” One famous case is the Supreme Court’s 1884 decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 8:18 am
Facts: This case (Burrows et al v. 3M Company – United States District Court – Western District of Washington – August 12, 2022) involves a personal injury claim. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:37 am
Lord Burrows sets out the correct modern approach to statutory interpretation, which is that the court is concerned to identify the meaning of the words used by Parliament, and in so doing, the context and purpose of the provision or provisions are important. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 3:30 am
” For a slightly more detailed explanation, I’ll defer to Commissioner Lucas: “[EEOC] Chair Burrows unilaterally issued the ‘technical assistance’ document addressing the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
It may be that in this regard Clibbery v Allan is now a dead letter and that Lykiardopulo was wrongly decided. [read post]
11 May 2022, 3:32 am
Deegas v L. [read post]
