Search for: "Burrows v. State of La*" Results 61 - 80 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2023, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiffs’ “hindsight criticism of counsels’ reasonable course of action . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d at 758 [citation and internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:28 am by Jim Eisenmann
Although limited now, political burrowing into civil service jobs—a long prohibited practice—could become a routine endeavor every four years. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:59 am by Brett Holubeck and Courtney Turkington
In a nod to LGBTQ+ Pride Month and the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:59 am by Courtney Turkington and Brett Holubeck
In a nod to LGBTQ+ Pride Month and the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:59 am by Brett Holubeck and Courtney Turkington
In a nod to LGBTQ+ Pride Month and the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Bostock v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:48 am by Toam Rubinstein and Stacy K. Marcus
” Compendium (Third) § 101.1(A); Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:48 am by Toam Rubinstein and Stacy K. Marcus
” Compendium (Third) § 101.1(A); Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:43 am by CMS
Mr Murray held he was bound by the decision in Meguerditchian v Lightbound [1917] 2 KB 298 and the Court of Appeal decision in Gavin Edmondson Solicitors Ltd v Haven Insurance Co Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1230 that held a lien does not arise where compensation is obtained without the need to issue proceedings. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Heidi Meinzer
  For more on crush videos and the First Amendment, see my prior post, Cleaning Up the Mess After United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am by Jonathan Fitchen
As will be seen, the minority (Lords Burrows and Sales) regarded there to have been a choice of applicable law for the contract to be arbitrated and proceeded from this to determine the applicable law of the arbitration agreement. [read post]