Search for: "Burrows v. State of La*"
Results 61 - 80
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am
In an early question from the bench, Lord Burrows queried what was meant by the “lowest common denominator”. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am
On 25 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in Anwar v The Advocate General (Representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy). [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 9:30 am
However, in AARP v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 7:23 am
State) * Pre-COVID, I cracked the mystery of the chipmunk emoji * A few quick links that I haven’t previously posted: – Lindemer v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 6:59 am
EEOC & Bostock v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 9:47 am
The landmark Supreme Court ruling Roe v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:28 am
Although limited now, political burrowing into civil service jobs—a long prohibited practice—could become a routine endeavor every four years. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:54 am
Google Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am
As will be seen, the minority (Lords Burrows and Sales) regarded there to have been a choice of applicable law for the contract to be arbitrated and proceeded from this to determine the applicable law of the arbitration agreement. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:48 am
C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282). [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The first is Secretary of State for Health and Ors v Servier Laboratories and Ors. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Burrows gave the sole judgment. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Kitchin, Lord Hamblen, and Lord Burrows. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 4:58 pm
See Burrows v Houda [2020] NSWDC 485. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 6:50 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am
TheInfluence of Member State Submissions on Copyright Law” (forthcoming Modern LawReview)]This paper presented a really fascinating look at the "explosion" of copyright jurisprudence at the CJEU. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
Furthermore, with respect to the Emerson defendants, it is undisputed that they were not present when the allegedly defamatory statement was made and, significantly, the complaint is bereft of any allegations setting forth a basis to hold them liable for Burrows’s statement (see Bostich v United States Trust Corp., 233 AD2d 193, 194). [read post]
8 May 2019, 10:30 am
Murphy’s article Abandon Chevron and Modernize Stare Decisis for the Administrative State is cited in the following article: Heather Elliott, Gorsuch v. the Administrative State, 70 ALA. [read post]
