Search for: "Burrows v. State of La*"
Results 81 - 100
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
The USCO emphasizes that authorship has to be limited to the creations of “human authors”, according to some US case-law dating back to 1884 (Supreme Court Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:56 am
More metric-based support for this suggestion appeared in the June 27 article by Peter Burrows on Bloomberg.com entitled "Apple's TV Ads Touting Company Values Flop With Viewers", here. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
United States USA today had a piece “Newsmax apologizes for airing false allegations against Dominion worker, who drops company from suit”. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 3:30 am
” For a slightly more detailed explanation, I’ll defer to Commissioner Lucas: “[EEOC] Chair Burrows unilaterally issued the ‘technical assistance’ document addressing the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:48 pm
University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
In her statement, Ms Shaw accepted that Mr Sykes did not kill or otherwise cause the death of Ms Sykes and Ms Burrows (his ex-partner), nor did he mentally and physically abuse Ms Sykes and Ms Burrows. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
Downing v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
See Town Versus Gown Fight Continues Over State University EIR. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 7:19 am
Burrow, 16 U.S.C.M.A. 94, 36 C.M.R. 250; Pointer v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
The judge determined that "[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright" (referring to the decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 1:30 am
The judge determined that "[h]uman involvement in, and ultimate creative control over, the work at issue was key to the conclusion that the new type of work fell within the bounds of copyright" (referring to the decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v Sarony). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:35 pm
As Justice Kennedy stated in Gonzales v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
In Janssen v Teva (2009) the Federal Circuit stated that mere plausibility does not suffice to meet this requirement, if it did then patents could be obtained for little more than “respectable guesses”. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:57 am
(Peter Mensch v Louise Mensch, NYSCEF index no. 309381/2017.) [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:25 am
EEOC Chair Charlotte Burrows lauded Congress’s repeal of the Trump-era rule, stating that the change “restores the Commission’s flexibility to tailor the conciliation process to the facts and circumstances of each case, thus increasing the likelihood of a successful resolution. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm
The question whether mere consequential loss satisfies the tort gateway had been considered before by the Supreme Court in the very same case: Brownlie v Four Seasons [2017] UKSC 80; [2018] 2 All ER 91 (“Brownlie I”). [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 4:34 pm
District Court in National Women’s Law Center v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am
Byrne and Bowie v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Resource Investments v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:55 am
These principles (as approved and slightly amended by Blindley Heath Investments Ltd & Anor v Bass [2015] EWCA Civ 1023 (“Blindley Heath”)) were referred to in Lord Burrows’ Supreme Court judgment: It is not enough that the common assumption is merely understood by the parties in the same way. [read post]
