Search for: "Burrows v. The Marshal" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
The Court of Appeal was presented with the opportunity to follow its own 1958 decision of Payne v Cooper rather than the recent string of cases, (Burrows, Marshall, Aston, Ansell). [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:32 pm
There was no revival of tenancy nor was a new tenancy spontaneously generated (Marshall v Bradford). [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Marshall is wrong on the limits of s.85(4) and Swindon v Aston is wrong on s.85(2). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:15 am by Dennis Crouch
  The Office also relies heavily on Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am by Jed Handelsman Shugerman
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in Seila Law v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]