Search for: "Buxton v. Buxton"
Results 21 - 40
of 75
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
This issue may also arise in connection with an employee's former employer supplying information to a prospective employer of the individual in response to a request for "references" (see Buxton v Plant City, 57 LW 2649). [read post]
19 May 2007, 9:54 am
State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
TDCJ-CID (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)Buxton v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:29 am
Berky, R (on the application of) v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:43 am
Permission to appeal had been refused on paper by Sir Richard Buxton on 6 March 2012 but granted by Moore-Bick LJ at an oral hearing on 26 March 2012. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 9:49 pm
Murray Heining, Chairman of the Association of Costs Lawyers, recently commented on this issue and repeated the comments of Dyson LJ (as he then was) in Buxton v Mills-Owens [2010] 1 WLR 1997: “[the solicitors] were under a professional duty not to include in the court documents that they drafted any contention which they did not consider to be properly arguable and not to instruct counsel to advance contentions which they did not consider to be properly arguable. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:03 am
” I have a lot of sympathy with the analysis of Buxton LJ, but Arden LJ, in the minority, disagreed. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
One can easily agree with Lord Justice Buxton, and as he further states, 'use' should entail a more active component than just passively placing in in a sphere where it is easily accessed from, even by accident. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am
" Buxton v Plant City, 57 LW 2649, provides an example of this type of complaint.* See https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/2010/11/employee-denied-unemployment-insurance.html** Ms. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
In Tileston v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm
More recently, in Ferdinand v MGN Limited [2011] EWHC 2454 (QB) Nicol J said that a substantial body of the public would consider that the England football captain fell within Buxton LJ’s list of “those from whom higher standards were expected”. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 5:03 pm
High Peak BC v Purser Buxton County Court 26/11/2007, like North Devon Homes v Batchelor, concerned a conviction for posession of drugs. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
" Griswold v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
After conducting a survey of the classifications used in the authorities including Campbell v MGN [2004] AC 457, Douglas v Hello! [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 11:55 pm
Roskelley, 359 F.3d 1105, 1110-12 (9th Cir.2004); Buxton v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:19 am
In reaching this conclusion, the Senior Master referred to: Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 at [132]; McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73 per Buxton LJ at [8]; Wainwright v The Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406 at [18]-[19] and [23], [43] and [62] Perhaps unsurprisingly, the notion of a tort of physical intrusion privacy were given short shrift. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:49 pm
It was the Court of Appeal decision in McKennitt v Ash [ 2008] QB 73 , comprising of Buxton LJ, Longmore LJ ( pictured) and Latham LJ, which first set out clearly the false privacy principles namely; The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private not whether it is true or false. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 3:44 am
Buxton v Zukoff 2021 NY Slip Op 06942 Decided on December 14, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department sheds some light in a failure to file the notice of claim/late notice of claim setting. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:03 am
" Buxton v Plant City, 57 LW 2649, provides an example of this type of complaint. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 4:15 pm
Merpel agrees, but adds that sometimes it is quite possible to work out the identity of the concealed celebrity - as happened to the unfortunate footballer in one of the cases cited in this judgment, A v B.Right Mann for the jobHesco Bastion Ltd v TFL Defence Ltd and others, decided yesterday in the Chancery Division, is a ruling of Judge Martin Mann QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, the IPKat found a note on it on LexisNexis Butterworths. [read post]
