Search for: "Byrnes v. Byrnes"
Results 1 - 20
of 566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2007, 12:03 pm
The same Patrick Byrne whose underlings threaten teenage bloggers. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
Peter Byrne (Georgetown) has posted Stop the Stop the Beach Plurality! [read post]
15 May 2011, 10:29 pm
Peter Byrne (Georgetown) has posted Stop the Stop the Beach Plurality! [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 2:34 am
Byrne v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:11 pm
In Byrne v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:36 pm
Here is the abstract: The plurality opinion in Stop the Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 2:01 am
Challenge to bias must be made immediately Steadman-Byrne v Amjad and Others Court of Appeal “A clear manifestation of bias on the part of a tribunal should ordinarily be drawn to its attention immediately. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 12:10 pm
Criminal law — Sufficiency of evidence — Second-degree assault and malicious destruction of property Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Brandon Joseph Byrne, appellant, was convicted of five counts of second-degree assault; four counts of malicious destruction of property; and one count each of failure to immediately stop a vehicle ... [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 6:44 am
UK in breach of uninsured drivers’ duty Byrne v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:01 pm
"It won't surprise me if we see a dozen more lawsuits exactly like this one before November.Update: Here's the complaint, which includes claims for direct and vicarious copyright infringement and a claim under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, based on the theory that Crist's video falsely implied that Byrne endorsed Crist's Senate campaign.David Byrne v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 7:15 am
As we noted in our weekly Law and Media Round Up, on 22 April 2015 the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council heard a libel appeal from Dominica in the case of Pinard-Byrne v Linton. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 8:25 am
The company and its wacky and incompetent CEO Patrick Byrne have been caught in yet another lie. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 12:30 pm
Dominion sued Byrne for defamation. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 2:47 pm
Stephen Byrne v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:41 am
Here's the abstract:The Supreme Court held in Lingle v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:22 am
O’Byrne v Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd [2010] UKSC 23; [2010] WLR (D) 137 ”In a claim under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 based on the rights conferred under Council Directive 85/374/EEC concerning liability for defective products, which by art 11 required proceedings to be brought against the producer within ten years of the product being put into circulation, domestic law could not allow the producer to be substituted as the defendant outside that period in place… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:22 am
O’Byrne v Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd [2010] UKSC 23; [2010] WLR (D) 137 “In a claim under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 based on the rights conferred under Council Directive 85/374/EEC concerning liability for defective products, which by art 11 required proceedings to be brought against the producer within ten years of the product being put into circulation, domestic law could not allow the producer to be substituted as the defendant outside that period in place of a… [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 11:04 am
A Ninth Circuit panel today decided City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 2:48 am
O'Byrne v Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 939 “A party could be substituted under s 35 of the Limitation Act 1980 where the ten-year limitation period for making a claim for damage caused by a defective product had expired, even where the correct party was known to the claimant before the limitation period expired, if the claimant had made a mistake about the name of the defendant and substitution was necessary for the purpose of determining the original… [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 2:31 am
O’Byrne v Aventis Pasteur SA Court of Justice of the European Union "While English law allowed for the substitution of one defendant for another outside the limitation period as long as the action was brought within that period, European Union law did not allow the producer of allegedly defective goods to be substituted outside that period, [...] [read post]
