Search for: "C. B. v. Board of School Commissioners"
Results 21 - 40
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
* In this instance the CBA defined a "grievance" as "any dispute or claim by either party . . . arising out of or in connection with this Agreement" other than matters that involved [a] the School Board's exercising its discretion, [b] a nonapproval of tenure decision; and [c] matters where a review was prescribed by law. ** Subject limited exceptions, as a general rule only the certified or recognized employee organization may… [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 7:03 am
Montgomery County Board of Revision, BTA Case No. 95-M-855 (May 2, 1997); McDonald Local School District Board of Education v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am
R (on the application of G) v The Governors of X School, heard 11 – 12 April 2011. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:10 am
Spina, and Robert C. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:00 am
The materials sought related to the investigation of two complaints filed with the Office of the Special Commissioner of Investigation for the New York City School District (SCI) concerning whether a speech that was given by an employee of the New York State Department of Education (DOE) at a public high school and later reproduced on DOE's website violated Chancellor's Regulations D-130(I)(B)(2), (I)(B)(8), and (I)(C)(1). [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
R (on the application of G) v The Governors of X School, heard 11 – 12 April 2011. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 8:15 am
From N.U. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Decided on June 16, 2022 No. 55 [*1]In the Matter of DCH Auto, & c. et al., Appellants, vTown of Mamaroneck, & c., et al., Respondents. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:07 pm
Decided on June 16, 2022 No. 55 [*1]In the Matter of DCH Auto, & c. et al., Appellants, vTown of Mamaroneck, & c., et al., Respondents. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
Secretaries v Board of Educ. of Scarsdale Union Free School Dist. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 and another, heard 21 -22 February 2011. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
McCann v The State Hospital Board for Scotland (Scotland), heard 11-12 October 2016. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 4:04 pm
Mulgrew:This letter will confirm the mutual understandings and agreements between the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York ("DOE") and the United Federation of Teachers ("UFT"). [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 12:16 pm
Note that it's unsettled whether viewpoint-based removals of books from school library shelves are constitutional—Board of Ed. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
McCann v The State Hospital Board for Scotland (Scotland), heard 11-12 October 2016. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Inj. and Workers’ Comp. 2d §§ 4.05[2][a]-[c], 27.01[1][c]; Rassp & Herlick, California Workers’ Compensation Law, Ch. 10, § 10.01[4].] ■ Angela Dawson, Applicant v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:02 pm
G.S. 160A-300.1(c). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
App. 2001) (finding members of city’s board of commissioners were public figures and thus required to show actual malice in defamation action), Campbell v. [read post]
