Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 121 - 140 of 3,954
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
The objection is raised against claim 14, which the [opponent] argued to be directed to an essentially biological process for the production of animals.[3] This objection has not been mentioned in the statement setting out the grounds of appeal, but the Board notes that the opposition was originally filed inter alia on the ground that the subject-matter of the patent was not patentable under A 53(b) […].[4] The [opponent] has explained that it decided to raise the objection in view… [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am by Laura Sandwell
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:53 am by Laura Sandwell
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 2:51 pm by Ron
If both R and partner G(rinder) can do equivalent quality legal work, then, for costing purposes, both R and G should figure in to the cost at the same hourly rate. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The Board held that the joint employer’s second amended charge, which alleged for the first time that the Association’s General Municipal Law (GML) §207-c hearing proposal was nonarbitrable under §209.4(g) of the Act, was untimely because it did not relate back to the joint employer’s original claim challenging the mandatory nature of the proposal under the Act. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Therefore, when deciding upon the novelty of the subject-matter of claim 1, its technical features have to be determined first.[4] In accordance with decision G 2/88 [2.5], the technical features of a claim directed to a physical activity (e.g. method, process, use) are the physical steps which define such activity. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:13 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The proprietor concluded that, accordingly, since only partial homologous recombination on limited portions of the respective genomes took place, the claimed method was not directed to a process for the production of plants involving sexually crossing the whole genomes of plants as referred to decisions G 2/07 and G 1/08, and that, consequently, decisions G 2/07 and G 1/08 did not apply and the claimed subject-matter did not fall within the exceptions of… [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:13 am by Docket Navigator
While exceptions to Rule 12(g)(2)’s timing requirement exist for challenges related to failure to state a claim or lack of subject matter jurisdiction, there are no exceptions to Rule 12(g)(2) for venue. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:56 am by S & F Media LLC.
(g) The responsibilities each party will have with regard to any minor children they have in common. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The only condition defined in A 53(c) for a claim to be excluded from patentability is that it contains subject-matter being a method for treatment of the human or animal body by surgery or therapy or a diagnostic method. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am by Laura Sandwell
G v Scottish Ministers & Anor, heard 7 – 8 October 2013. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The ED denied the novelty of the subject-matter of claim 1 over the disclosure in document D1, a document relevant under A 54(3). [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 7:33 pm by Immigration Lawyer Peter Messersmith
  We see a lot of INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i), INA 212(a)(2)(C)(i), INA 212(a)(3)(a), and INA 212(a)(3)(b) inadmissibility determinations following a mandamus “win. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 10:53 am
The Board’s decision in Matter of A-R-C-G, 26 I&N Dec. 388 (BIA 2014) held that “married women in Guatemala who are unable to leave their relationship,” constitute a legally cognizable “particular social group,” (PGS.) and under the right circumstances, could be considered refugees and granted asylum in the United States. [read post]